A8-3800 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.47
+318%
A8-3800
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.31

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G outperforms A8-3800 by a whopping 318% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A8-3800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11632271
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.81no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency7.821.87
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date12 February 2018 (6 years ago)30 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A8-3800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.7 GHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache128K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size210 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors4,950 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A8-3800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FM1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A8-3800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A8-3800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A8-3800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11AMD Radeon HD 6550D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A8-3800.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 5.47
+318%
A8-3800 1.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 8532
+316%
A8-3800 2049

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.47 1.31
Integrated graphics card 5.47 1.04
Recency 12 February 2018 30 June 2011
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has a 317.6% higher aggregate performance score, 426% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-3800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A8-3800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
AMD A8-3800
A8-3800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 174 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 69 votes

Rate A8-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G or A8-3800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.