A12-9800 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.37
+137%
A12-9800
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.27

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G outperforms A12-9800 by a whopping 137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A12-9800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11721823
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.911.45
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency7.823.31
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169$139

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has 308% better value for money than A12-9800.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A12-9800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB2048 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size209.78 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A12-9800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A12-9800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A12-9800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A12-9800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-2400
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A12-9800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A12-9800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A12-9800.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 5.37
+137%
A12-9800 2.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 8537
+136%
A12-9800 3611

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.37 2.27
Recency 10 May 2018 27 July 2017
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has a 136.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is our recommended choice as it beats the A12-9800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and A12-9800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
AMD A12-9800
A12-9800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 181 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 197 votes

Rate A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G or A12-9800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.