Ryzen 3 3300 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen 3 3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking994not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency10.31no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)March 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen 3 3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads12no data
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 million4800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen 3 3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt50 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen 3 3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen 3 3300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen 3 3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen 3 3300.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 50 Watt

Ryzen 3 3300 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen 3 3300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen 3 3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
AMD Ryzen 3 3300
Ryzen 3 3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 47 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 32 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 or Ryzen 3 3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.