FX-8320E vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
7.10
+127%
FX-8320E
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.13

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 outperforms FX-8320E by a whopping 127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and FX-8320E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9921613
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.69
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency10.293.10
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)2 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$147

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and FX-8320E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache576 KBno data
L2 cache3 MB8192 KB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size213 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors4800 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and FX-8320E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and FX-8320E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and FX-8320E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and FX-8320E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and FX-8320E.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 7.10
+127%
FX-8320E 3.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 11240
+127%
FX-8320E 4960

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.10 3.13
Recency 29 June 2017 2 September 2014
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a 126.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 50% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

FX-8320E, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8320E in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is a server/workstation processor while FX-8320E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and FX-8320E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 47 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1108 votes

Rate FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 or FX-8320E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.