EPYC 9654 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
7.21
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
77.10
+969%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 by a whopping 969% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9926
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.28
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.3019.89
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)96
Threads12192
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3224
L1 cache576 KB6 MB
L2 cache3 MB96 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size213 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 7.21
EPYC 9654 77.10
+969%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 11240
EPYC 9654 120176
+969%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.21 77.10
Recency 29 June 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 6 96
Threads 12 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 360 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 453.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 969.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 47 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 992 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.