Ultra 7 265F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking992not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency10.30no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1220
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache576 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size213 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM41851
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 20
Threads 12 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm

Ultra 7 265F has 233.3% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Core Ultra 7 265F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Core Ultra 7 265F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 47 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 or Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.