Athlon PRO 300GE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1500

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.95
+112%

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 outperforms Athlon PRO 300GE by a whopping 112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon PRO 300GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11221693
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Athlon
Power efficiency8.357.32
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)30 September 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon PRO 300GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3534
L1 cache384 KB192 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size213 mm2209.78 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon PRO 300GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4Socket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon PRO 300GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon PRO 300GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon PRO 300GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-2666
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon PRO 300GE.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 5.95
+112%
Athlon PRO 300GE 2.81

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 9099
+111%
Athlon PRO 300GE 4308

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 1146
+22.2%
Athlon PRO 300GE 938

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 3696
+93.3%
Athlon PRO 300GE 1912

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.95 2.81
Recency 29 June 2017 30 September 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has a 111.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon PRO 300GE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon PRO 300GE in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon PRO 300GE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon PRO 300GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
Athlon PRO 300GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 43 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 113 votes

Rate Athlon PRO 300GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 or Athlon PRO 300GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.