A6-9225 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.95
+584%

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 outperforms A6-9225 by a whopping 584% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and A6-9225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11212565
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency8.355.29
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and A6-9225 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache384 KB160 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size213 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors4800 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and A6-9225 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4BGA
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and A6-9225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and A6-9225 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and A6-9225. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and A6-9225.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 5.95
+584%
A6-9225 0.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 9099
+583%
A6-9225 1332

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 1146
+323%
A6-9225 271

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 3696
+716%
A6-9225 453

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.95 0.87
Recency 29 June 2017 1 June 2018
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has a 583.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A6-9225, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9225 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is a server/workstation processor while A6-9225 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and A6-9225, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
AMD A6-9225
A6-9225

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 43 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2289 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 or A6-9225, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.