Xeon Gold 6526Y vs Ryzen 5 8640U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 8640U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
13.20
Xeon Gold 6526Y
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 195 Watt
28.97
+119%

Xeon Gold 6526Y outperforms Ryzen 5 8640U by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 8640U and Xeon Gold 6526Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking565154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.15
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency44.6114.06
Architecture codenameHawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,517

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 8640U and Xeon Gold 6526Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)37.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size178 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data82 °C
Number of transistors25,000 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 8640U and Xeon Gold 6526Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP8FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt195 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8640U and Xeon Gold 6526Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 8640U and Xeon Gold 6526Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8640U and Xeon Gold 6526Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8640U and Xeon Gold 6526Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 760MN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8640U and Xeon Gold 6526Y.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 8640U 13.20
Xeon Gold 6526Y 28.97
+119%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 8640U 20971
Xeon Gold 6526Y 46025
+119%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.20 28.97
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 12 32
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 195 Watt

Ryzen 5 8640U has 596.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6526Y, on the other hand, has a 119.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6526Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 8640U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 8640U is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6526Y is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8640U and Xeon Gold 6526Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
Ryzen 5 8640U
Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y
Xeon Gold 6526Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 8640U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 12 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6526Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 8640U or Xeon Gold 6526Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.