Xeon Phi 7210 vs Ryzen 5 8600G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 8600G
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
15.96
+247%
Xeon Phi 7210
2016
64 cores / 256 threads, 215 Watt
4.60

Ryzen 5 8600G outperforms Xeon Phi 7210 by a whopping 247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon Phi 7210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4251301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation50.50no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency23.242.02
Architecture codenamePhoenix (2023−2024)Knights Landing (2016)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon Phi 7210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads12256
Base clock speed4.3 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)32 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Number of transistors25,000 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon Phi 7210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM53647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt215 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon Phi 7210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon Phi 7210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon Phi 7210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon Phi 7210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 760Mno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon Phi 7210.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 8600G 15.96
+247%
Xeon Phi 7210 4.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 8600G 25354
+247%
Xeon Phi 7210 7306

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.96 4.60
Recency 8 January 2024 20 June 2016
Physical cores 6 64
Threads 12 256
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 215 Watt

Ryzen 5 8600G has a 247% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 230.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Phi 7210, on the other hand, has 966.7% more physical cores and 2033.3% more threads.

The Ryzen 5 8600G is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Phi 7210 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 8600G is a desktop processor while Xeon Phi 7210 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon Phi 7210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
Ryzen 5 8600G
Intel Xeon Phi 7210
Xeon Phi 7210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 331 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 8600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 8600G or Xeon Phi 7210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.