EPYC Embedded 3301 vs Ryzen 5 8600G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 8600G and EPYC Embedded 3301 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 416 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 47.70 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 23.24 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix (2023−2024) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $450 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 8600G and EPYC Embedded 3301 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 4.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 20 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 1152 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 25,000 million | 9600 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 8600G and EPYC Embedded 3301 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and EPYC Embedded 3301. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and EPYC Embedded 3301 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and EPYC Embedded 3301. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 760M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and EPYC Embedded 3301.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 January 2024 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
Ryzen 5 8600G has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
EPYC Embedded 3301, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 8600G and EPYC Embedded 3301. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 8600G is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3301 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8600G and EPYC Embedded 3301, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
