Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Ryzen 5 8600G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 8600G
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
16.59
+2576%
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.62

Ryzen 5 8600G outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by a whopping 2576% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 8600G and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4162789
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation47.97no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency23.271.62
Architecture codenamePhoenix (2023−2024)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 8600G and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed4.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5 GHz1.66 GHz
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography4 nm65 nm
Die size178 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors25,000 million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 8600G and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM5PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Celeron Dual-Core T1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Celeron Dual-Core T1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 760Mno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Celeron Dual-Core T1600.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 8600G 16.59
+2576%
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 0.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 8600G 25396
+2573%
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 950

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.59 0.62
Recency 8 January 2024 1 May 2008
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 8600G has a 2575.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron Dual-Core T1600, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 8600G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 8600G is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8600G and Celeron Dual-Core T1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
Ryzen 5 8600G
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Celeron Dual-Core T1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 282 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 8600G or Celeron Dual-Core T1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.