Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U vs Ryzen 5 7640HS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
14.53
+20.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
12.04

Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 7640HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking492637
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency39.1275.64
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Barcelo-U Refresh (2023)
Release dateJanuary 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 7640HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed4.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm7 nm
Die size178 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistors25,000 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 7640HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP8FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7640HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7640HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7640HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 760MAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7640HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 7640HS 14.53
+20.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 12.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 7640HS 22996
+20.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 19061

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 7640HS 2292
+47.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 1552

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 7640HS 9158
+63.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 5611

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 7640HS 2079
+18.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 1756

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 7640HS 271
+18.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 229

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 5 7640HS 9355
+42.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 6560

Blender(-)

Ryzen 5 7640HS 245
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 302
+23.1%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 5 7640HS 1941
+35%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 1438

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 5 7640HS 6465
+22.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 5269

7-Zip

Ryzen 5 7640HS 54954
+19.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 45924

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 5 7640HS 316
+24.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 254

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.53 12.04
Integrated graphics card 14.95 9.04
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 7640HS has a 20.7% higher aggregate performance score, 65.4% faster integrated GPU, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7640HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 476 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 25 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 7640HS or Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.