i9-13900H vs Ryzen 5 7600X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 7600X
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 105 Watt
17.93
Core i9-13900H
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 45 Watt
18.01
+0.4%

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i9-13900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking345341
Place by popularity68not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Raptor Lake-H
Power efficiency16.1637.88
Architecture codenameRaphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)Raptor Lake-H (2023)
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$617

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i9-13900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1220
Base clock speed4.7 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache384 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size71+122 mm257 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)61 °C72 °C
Number of transistorsCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i9-13900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i9-13900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475VIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i9-13900H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i9-13900H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i9-13900H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GB96 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.5 GHz
Execution Unitsno data96

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i9-13900H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i9-13900H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i9-13900H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i9-13900H.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes248

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 7600X 17.93
i9-13900H 18.01
+0.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 7600X 28475
i9-13900H 28608
+0.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 5 7600X 8480
i9-13900H 9550
+12.6%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 5 7600X 49430
i9-13900H 53904
+9.1%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 5 7600X 17291
+16.1%
i9-13900H 14893

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 5 7600X 2.76
+27.5%
i9-13900H 3.52

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 5 7600X 28
i9-13900H 28
+0.5%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 7600X 2517
i9-13900H 2667
+5.9%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 7600X 314
+12.5%
i9-13900H 279

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 7600X 3.71
+24.5%
i9-13900H 2.98

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 5 7600X 13.2
i9-13900H 13.3
+0.8%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 5 7600X 16178
+138%
i9-13900H 6800

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 5 7600X 148
+29.7%
i9-13900H 114

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 5 7600X 367
+23.4%
i9-13900H 298

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 5 7600X 12003
i9-13900H 12890
+7.4%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 5 7600X 205
+4.6%
i9-13900H 196

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 5 7600X 2217
+13.4%
i9-13900H 1955

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 5 7600X 8058
+28.4%
i9-13900H 6276

7-Zip

Ryzen 5 7600X 69291
i9-13900H 70166
+1.3%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 5 7600X 371
+17.2%
i9-13900H 316

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 5 7600X 2193
+14.7%
i9-13900H 1912

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 5 7600X 298
+5.1%
i9-13900H 284

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 5 7600X 328
i9-13900H 336
+2.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.93 18.01
Recency 27 September 2022 4 January 2023
Physical cores 6 14
Threads 12 20
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 45 Watt

i9-13900H has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, 133.3% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i9-13900H.

Note that Ryzen 5 7600X is a desktop processor while Core i9-13900H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i9-13900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
Intel Core i9-13900H
Core i9-13900H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 2175 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 552 votes

Rate Core i9-13900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 7600X or Core i9-13900H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.