Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Ryzen 5 7600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 7600
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
17.06
+9.9%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.53

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking380449
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.02no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency24.7152.22
Architecture codenameRaphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date14 January 2023 (1 year ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache32 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size71 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)61 °Cno data
Number of transistorsCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM5no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475Vno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 7600 17.06
+9.9%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 15.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 7600 27096
+9.8%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 24670

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 7600 2747
+27.8%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 2149

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 7600 12225
+28.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 9513

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 7600 2339
+5.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 2218

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 7600 298
+12.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 265

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 5 7600 11095
+11.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 9968

Blender(-)

Ryzen 5 7600 219
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 237
+8.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 5 7600 2088
+12.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 1853

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 5 7600 7566
+28.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 5900

7-Zip

Ryzen 5 7600 64613
+10.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 58386

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 5 7600 345
+21.9%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 283

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 5 7600 352
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 390
+10.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.06 15.53
Integrated graphics card 4.42 18.33
Recency 14 January 2023 3 May 2023
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 5 7600 has a 9.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, on the other hand, has 314.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 months, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U.

Note that Ryzen 5 7600 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Ryzen 5 7600
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1264 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 50 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 7600 or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.