EPYC 7203P vs Ryzen 5 7600
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 7600 and EPYC 7203P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 373 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 64 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 52.01 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 24.84 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | 14 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 5 September 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $348 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 7600 and EPYC 7203P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 71 mm2 | 2x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 61 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | CCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million | 8,300 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 7600 and EPYC 7203P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7600 and EPYC 7203P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7600 and EPYC 7203P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7600 and EPYC 7203P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-5200 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7600 and EPYC 7203P.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 January 2023 | 5 September 2023 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 120 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7600 has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 84.6% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7203P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 7600 and EPYC 7203P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 7600 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7203P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7600 and EPYC 7203P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
