Phenom II X3 P820 vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 7530U outperforms Phenom II X3 P820 by a whopping 1426% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 7530U and Phenom II X3 P820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 767 | 2738 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | no data | 3x AMD Phenom II |
Power efficiency | 63.53 | 2.50 |
Architecture codename | Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 7530U and Phenom II X3 P820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
Threads | 12 | 3 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 3600 MHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1.5 MB |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 180 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 10,700 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 7530U and Phenom II X3 P820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FP6 | S1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Phenom II X3 P820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | Virtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a) |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
VirusProtect | - | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Phenom II X3 P820 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Phenom II X3 P820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Phenom II X3 P820.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 10.07 | 0.66 |
Recency | 4 January 2023 | 12 May 2010 |
Physical cores | 6 | 3 |
Threads | 12 | 3 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7530U has a 1425.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 7530U is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X3 P820 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7530U and Phenom II X3 P820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.