Celeron M 722 vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron M 722 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 767 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 63.53 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 1 October 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron M 722 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,700 million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron M 722 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP6 | VGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 5.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron M 722. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron M 722 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron M 722. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron M 722.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 1 October 2008 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 5 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7530U has an age advantage of 14 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 722, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron M 722. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron M 722, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
