Celeron 927UE vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 927UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 764 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 63.65 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 927UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 10,700 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 927UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP6 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 927UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 927UE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 927UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 927UE.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 7.46 | 0.63 |
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 1 January 2013 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 17 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7530U has 1084.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 214.3% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 927UE. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 927UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
