Athlon II Neo K325 vs Ryzen 5 7530U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon II Neo K325 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking767not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon II Neo
Power efficiency63.53no data
Architecture codenameBarcelo-U Refresh (2023)Geneva (2010)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon II Neo K325 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rateno data2000 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm45 nm
Die size180 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors10,700 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon II Neo K325 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP6S1
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon II Neo K325. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMESSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, PowerNow, HyperTransport 3.0
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
VirusProtect-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon II Neo K325 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon II Neo K325. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 7no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon II Neo K325.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 7530U 15991
+3735%
Athlon II Neo K325 417

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 7530U 1636
+935%
Athlon II Neo K325 158

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 7530U 5662
+1873%
Athlon II Neo K325 287

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2023 12 May 2010
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 12 Watt

Ryzen 5 7530U has an age advantage of 12 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon II Neo K325, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon II Neo K325. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon II Neo K325, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 7530U
Ryzen 5 7530U
AMD Athlon II Neo K325
Athlon II Neo K325

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 633 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7530U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate Athlon II Neo K325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 7530U or Athlon II Neo K325, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.