Athlon 64 X2 4200+ vs Ryzen 5 7530U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 7530U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
10.03
+2080%
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.46

Ryzen 5 7530U outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4200+ by a whopping 2080% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7742939
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency62.950.49
Architecture codenameBarcelo-U Refresh (2023)Manchester (2005−2006)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)December 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)256K
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography7 nm90 nm
Die size180 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors10,700 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6939
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon 64 X2 4200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon 64 X2 4200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 2000 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon 64 X2 4200+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 7530U 10.03
+2080%
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 0.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 7530U 15931
+2079%
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 731

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 7530U 1636
+898%
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 164

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 7530U 5658
+1935%
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 278

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.03 0.46
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 89 Watt

Ryzen 5 7530U has a 2080.4% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 493.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7530U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 7530U is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 4200+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7530U and Athlon 64 X2 4200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 7530U
Ryzen 5 7530U
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Athlon 64 X2 4200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 682 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7530U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 149 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 7530U or Athlon 64 X2 4200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.