EPYC 9534 vs Ryzen 5 7520U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 7520U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
6.02
EPYC 9534
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
61.35
+919%

EPYC 9534 outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by a whopping 919% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 7520U and EPYC 9534 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking111217
Place by popularity27not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.70
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)AMD EPYC
Power efficiency36.6019.98
Architecture codenameMendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date20 September 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,803

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 7520U and EPYC 9534 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads8128
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.45 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz2.45 GHz
Multiplierno data24.5
L1 cache64 KB (per core)4 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)64 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size100 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 7520U and EPYC 9534 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP6SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7520U and EPYC 9534. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7520U and EPYC 9534 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7520U and EPYC 9534. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 610Mno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7520U and EPYC 9534.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 7520U 6.02
EPYC 9534 61.35
+919%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 7520U 9206
EPYC 9534 93884
+920%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.02 61.35
Recency 20 September 2022 10 November 2022
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 8 128
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 280 Watt

Ryzen 5 7520U has 1766.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9534, on the other hand, has a 919.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9534 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7520U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 7520U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9534 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7520U and EPYC 9534, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U
AMD EPYC 9534
EPYC 9534

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1394 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9534 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 7520U or EPYC 9534, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.