EPYC 7773X vs Ryzen 5 4600U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 4600U
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
8.80
EPYC 7773X
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
59.78
+579%

EPYC 7773X outperforms Ryzen 5 4600U by a whopping 579% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 4600U and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking88621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency53.5019.47
Architecture codenameRenoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)Milan-X (2022)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 4600U and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads12128
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache384 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm
Die size156 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors9800 Million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 4600U and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP6SP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 4600U and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 4600U and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 4600U and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 4600U and EPYC 7773X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 4600U 8.80
EPYC 7773X 59.78
+579%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 4600U 13466
EPYC 7773X 91491
+579%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 4600U 1335
EPYC 7773X 1531
+14.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 4600U 4735
EPYC 7773X 15277
+223%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.80 59.78
Recency 6 January 2020 22 March 2022
Physical cores 6 64
Threads 12 128
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 280 Watt

Ryzen 5 4600U has 1766.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7773X, on the other hand, has a 579.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 966.7% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads.

The EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 4600U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 4600U is a notebook processor while EPYC 7773X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 4600U and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 4600U
Ryzen 5 4600U
AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 123 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4600U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 4600U or EPYC 7773X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.