Xeon E5-2643 v3 vs Ryzen 5 4600H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 4600H
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 54 Watt
9.08
+38%
Xeon E5-2643 v3
2014
6 cores / 12 threads, 135 Watt
6.58

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Xeon E5-2643 v3 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 4600H and Xeon E5-2643 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8411038
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency15.914.61
Architecture codenameRenoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)8 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 4600H and Xeon E5-2643 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed3 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rateno data9.6 GT/s
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache128K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache11 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm22 nm
Die size156 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C77 °C
Number of transistors9800 Million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 4600H and Xeon E5-2643 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP6FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 4600H and Xeon E5-2643 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 4600H and Xeon E5-2643 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 4600H and Xeon E5-2643 v3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 4600H and Xeon E5-2643 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size64 GB768 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 4600H and Xeon E5-2643 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 4600H 9.08
+38%
Xeon E5-2643 v3 6.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 4600H 14416
+38%
Xeon E5-2643 v3 10446

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.08 6.58
Recency 6 January 2020 8 September 2014
Chip lithography 7 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 135 Watt

Ryzen 5 4600H has a 38% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 214.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 4600H is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2643 v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 4600H is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2643 v3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 4600H and Xeon E5-2643 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
Ryzen 5 4600H
Intel Xeon E5-2643 v3
Xeon E5-2643 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 285152 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 158 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2643 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 4600H or Xeon E5-2643 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.