Xeon X5675 vs Ryzen 5 4500U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 4500U
2020
6 cores / 6 threads, 15 Watt
6.86
+70.2%
Xeon X5675
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.03

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms Xeon X5675 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 4500U and Xeon X5675 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10251421
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.08
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency43.284.01
Architecture codenameRenoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)14 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$162

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 4500U and Xeon X5675 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads612
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.06 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.46 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12288 KB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm32 nm
Die size156 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C81 °C
Number of transistors9800 Million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 4500U and Xeon X5675 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP6FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Xeon X5675. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 4500U and Xeon X5675 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Xeon X5675 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Xeon X5675. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB288 GB
Max memory channelsno data3
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Xeon X5675.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 4500U 6.86
+70.2%
Xeon X5675 4.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 4500U 10903
+70.5%
Xeon X5675 6396

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.86 4.03
Recency 6 January 2020 14 February 2011
Threads 6 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 5 4500U has a 70.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon X5675, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

The Ryzen 5 4500U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5675 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 4500U is a notebook processor while Xeon X5675 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 4500U and Xeon X5675, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Ryzen 5 4500U
Intel Xeon X5675
Xeon X5675

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2331 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 4500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 635 votes

Rate Xeon X5675 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 4500U or Xeon X5675, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.