Pentium E6300 vs Ryzen 5 4500U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 4500U
2020
6 cores / 6 threads, 25 Watt
6.90
+962%
Pentium E6300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.65

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms Pentium E6300 by a whopping 962% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 4500U and Pentium E6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10122746
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.59
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency26.010.94
Architecture codenameRenoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)9 May 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$40

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 4500U and Pentium E6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache128K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache11 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography7 nm45 nm
Die size156 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C74 °C
Number of transistors9800 Million228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 4500U and Pentium E6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Pentium E6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 4500U and Pentium E6300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Pentium E6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Pentium E6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Pentium E6300.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 4500U 6.90
+962%
Pentium E6300 0.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 4500U 10914
+958%
Pentium E6300 1032

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.90 0.65
Recency 6 January 2020 9 May 2009
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 4500U has a 961.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 4500U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 4500U is a notebook processor while Pentium E6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 4500U and Pentium E6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Ryzen 5 4500U
Intel Pentium E6300
Pentium E6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2310 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 77 votes

Rate Pentium E6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 4500U or Pentium E6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.