Celeron M 410 vs Ryzen 5 4500U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron M 410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1012not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Celeron M
Power efficiency26.01no data
Architecture codenameRenoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron M 410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads61
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.46 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache11 MB (shared)1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography7 nm65 nm
Die size156 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors9800 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron M 410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP6PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron M 410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron M 410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron M 410 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron M 410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron M 410.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 4500U 10913
+8772%
Celeron M 410 123

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 6 1
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 27 Watt

Ryzen 5 4500U has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron M 410. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron M 410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Ryzen 5 4500U
Intel Celeron M 410
Celeron M 410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2310 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 4500U or Celeron M 410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.