EPYC 7513 vs Ryzen 5 3600

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3600
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.60
EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
38.74
+234%

EPYC 7513 outperforms Ryzen 5 3600 by a whopping 234% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3600 and EPYC 7513 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking68984
Place by popularity9not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.5610.58
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency16.2717.66
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$2,840

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 3600 has 123% better value for money than EPYC 7513.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3600 and EPYC 7513 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1264
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.65 GHz
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3600 and EPYC 7513 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and EPYC 7513. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and EPYC 7513 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and EPYC 7513. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and EPYC 7513.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3600 11.60
EPYC 7513 38.74
+234%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3600 17747
EPYC 7513 59285
+234%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.60 38.74
Recency 7 July 2019 15 March 2021
Physical cores 6 32
Threads 12 64
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

Ryzen 5 3600 has 207.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7513, on the other hand, has a 234% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.

The EPYC 7513 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3600 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3600 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7513 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3600 and EPYC 7513, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 17125 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3600 or EPYC 7513, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.