Celeron N6211 vs Ryzen 5 3600
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 692% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 3600 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 692 | 2197 |
| Place by popularity | 9 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 21.91 | 3.33 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Elkhart Lake |
| Power efficiency | 16.26 | 20.53 |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (2019−2020) | Elkhart Lake (2022) |
| Release date | 7 July 2019 (5 years ago) | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $54 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 5 3600 has 558% better value for money than Celeron N6211.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3600 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3600 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | BGA1493 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.17 | 1.41 |
| Recency | 7 July 2019 | 17 July 2022 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3600 has a 692.2% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 983.3% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 3600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3600 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
