FX-9830P vs Ryzen 5 3500X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3500X
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
8.60
+294%

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms FX-9830P by a whopping 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9830P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9001865
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency12.065.68
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date24 September 2019 (5 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9830P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache384 KB320 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB (per module)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9830P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FP4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9830P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9830P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9830P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9830P.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3500X 8.60
+294%
FX-9830P 2.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3500X 13165
+295%
FX-9830P 3332

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 3500X 1582
+168%
FX-9830P 591

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 3500X 5958
+314%
FX-9830P 1438

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.60 2.18
Recency 24 September 2019 31 May 2016
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 3500X has a 294.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

FX-9830P, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 3500X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9830P in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3500X is a desktop processor while FX-9830P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9830P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
Ryzen 5 3500X
AMD FX-9830P
FX-9830P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1787 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 113 votes

Rate FX-9830P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3500X or FX-9830P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.