Ryzen 3 7320U vs Ryzen 5 3500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3500
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
8.35
+44.5%

Ryzen 5 3500 outperforms Ryzen 3 7320U by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 3 7320U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9271141
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency11.7135.14
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 3 7320U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads68
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 3 7320U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 3 7320U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 3 7320U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 3 7320U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 3 7320U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3500 8.35
+44.5%
Ryzen 3 7320U 5.78

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3500 12785
+44.6%
Ryzen 3 7320U 8839

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 3500 1514
+30.7%
Ryzen 3 7320U 1158

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 3500 5373
+48.7%
Ryzen 3 7320U 3614

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.35 5.78
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 3500 has a 44.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores.

Ryzen 3 7320U, on the other hand, has 33.3% more threads, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 7320U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3500 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 7320U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 3 7320U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Ryzen 5 3500
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
Ryzen 3 7320U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 757 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 664 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7320U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3500 or Ryzen 3 7320U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.