Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Ryzen 5 3450U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3450U
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.24
+2.9%
Xeon E5-1620 v2
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
4.12

Ryzen 5 3450U outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3450U and Xeon E5-1620 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13681386
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.05
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)no data
Power efficiency26.753.00
Architecture codenamePicasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
Release date1 May 2020 (4 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$315

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3450U and Xeon E5-1620 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rateno data0 GT/s
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB10 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data160 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C70 °C
Number of transistors4500 Million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3450U and Xeon E5-1620 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP5FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Xeon E5-1620 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 3450U and Xeon E5-1620 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Xeon E5-1620 v2 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Xeon E5-1620 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data59.7 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Xeon E5-1620 v2.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3450U 4.24
+2.9%
Xeon E5-1620 v2 4.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3450U 6737
+2.9%
Xeon E5-1620 v2 6549

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.24 4.12
Recency 1 May 2020 1 September 2013
Chip lithography 12 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 130 Watt

Ryzen 5 3450U has a 2.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 83.3% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 5 3450U and Xeon E5-1620 v2.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 3450U is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-1620 v2 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3450U and Xeon E5-1620 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3450U
Ryzen 5 3450U
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
Xeon E5-1620 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 390 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3450U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 112 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3450U or Xeon E5-1620 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.