FX-4170 vs Ryzen 5 3450U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3450U
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.40
+122%

Ryzen 5 3450U outperforms FX-4170 by a whopping 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3450U and FX-4170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13631951
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)no data
Power efficiency26.751.44
Architecture codenamePicasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date1 May 2020 (4 years ago)27 February 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3450U and FX-4170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache384 KB192 KB
L2 cache2 MB4096 KB
L3 cache4 MB8192 KB
Chip lithography12 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C61 °C
Number of transistors4500 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.1875 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3450U and FX-4170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP5AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and FX-4170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and FX-4170 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and FX-4170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and FX-4170.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3450U 4.40
+122%
FX-4170 1.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3450U 6735
+122%
FX-4170 3034

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.40 1.98
Recency 1 May 2020 27 February 2012
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 12 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen 5 3450U has a 122.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more threads, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 3450U is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4170 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 3450U is a notebook processor while FX-4170 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3450U and FX-4170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3450U
Ryzen 5 3450U
AMD FX-4170
FX-4170

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 389 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3450U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 76 votes

Rate FX-4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3450U or FX-4170, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.