i7-4900MQ vs Ryzen 5 3450U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3450U
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.25
+10.4%
Core i7-4900MQ
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 47 Watt
3.85

Ryzen 5 3450U outperforms Core i7-4900MQ by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3450U and Core i7-4900MQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13701451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Core i7
Power efficiency26.817.75
Architecture codenamePicasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date1 May 2020 (4 years ago)29 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$568

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3450U and Core i7-4900MQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache384 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data177 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistors4500 Million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3450U and Core i7-4900MQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP5FCPGA946
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt47 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Core i7-4900MQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 3450U and Core i7-4900MQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Core i7-4900MQ are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Core i7-4900MQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 4600
Max video memoryno data2 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.3 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 3450U and Core i7-4900MQ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
VGAno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Core i7-4900MQ integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data3840x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data3840x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno data2880x1800@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Core i7-4900MQ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12
OpenGLno data4.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Core i7-4900MQ.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3450U 4.25
+10.4%
i7-4900MQ 3.85

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3450U 6745
+10.2%
i7-4900MQ 6119

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 3450U 567
i7-4900MQ 641
+13.2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 3450U 138
i7-4900MQ 145
+5.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.25 3.85
Integrated graphics card 4.50 1.84
Recency 1 May 2020 29 April 2013
Chip lithography 12 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 47 Watt

Ryzen 5 3450U has a 10.4% higher aggregate performance score, 144.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, a 83.3% more advanced lithography process, and 213.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 3450U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-4900MQ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3450U and Core i7-4900MQ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3450U
Ryzen 5 3450U
Intel Core i7-4900MQ
Core i7-4900MQ

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 390 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3450U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 61 vote

Rate Core i7-4900MQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3450U or Core i7-4900MQ, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.