Xeon E3-1285L v4 vs Ryzen 5 3400GE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3400GE
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
5.82
+10.2%

Ryzen 5 3400GE outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3400GE and Xeon E3-1285L v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11301197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency15.167.41
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Broadwell-DT (2015)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)2 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3400GE and Xeon E3-1285L v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size210 mm2160 mm2
Number of transistors4,940 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3400GE and Xeon E3-1285L v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3400GE and Xeon E3-1285L v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
eDRAMno data128 MB
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 3400GE and Xeon E3-1285L v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3400GE and Xeon E3-1285L v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3400GE and Xeon E3-1285L v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11Intel Iris Pro P6300
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.15 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 3400GE and Xeon E3-1285L v4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3400GE and Xeon E3-1285L v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3400GE 5.82
+10.2%
Xeon E3-1285L v4 5.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3400GE 8907
+10.3%
Xeon E3-1285L v4 8074

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.82 5.28
Recency 7 July 2019 2 June 2015
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 3400GE has a 10.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 3400GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1285L v4 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3400GE is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1285L v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3400GE and Xeon E3-1285L v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE
Ryzen 5 3400GE
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
Xeon E3-1285L v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 37 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3400GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 48 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1285L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3400GE or Xeon E3-1285L v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.