MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms MediaTek Kompanio 520 by a whopping 192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 3400G and MediaTek Kompanio 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1112 | 1921 |
| Place by popularity | 92 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | MediaTek Kompanio 500 |
| Power efficiency | 8.47 | 0.09 |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | 2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55 |
| Release date | 7 July 2019 (5 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3400G and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 37 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3400G and MediaTek Kompanio 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 2000 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and MediaTek Kompanio 520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and MediaTek Kompanio 520 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and MediaTek Kompanio 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and MediaTek Kompanio 520.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.82 | 1.99 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 2000 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3400G has a 192.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 2976.9% lower power consumption.
MediaTek Kompanio 520, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 5 3400G is our recommended choice as it beats the MediaTek Kompanio 520 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 3400G is a desktop processor while MediaTek Kompanio 520 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3400G and MediaTek Kompanio 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
