EPYC 7532 vs Ryzen 5 3400G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3400G
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
6.05
EPYC 7532
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
34.47
+470%

EPYC 7532 outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G by a whopping 470% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3400G and EPYC 7532 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1108117
Place by popularity91not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency8.4915.72
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date12 June 2019 (5 years ago)19 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3400G and EPYC 7532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier3724
L1 cache384 KB2 MB
L2 cache2 MB16 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size210 mm2no data
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3400G and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and EPYC 7532.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3400G 6.05
EPYC 7532 34.47
+470%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3400G 9252
EPYC 7532 52755
+470%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 3400G 1133
EPYC 7532 1208
+6.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 3400G 3631
EPYC 7532 10136
+179%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.05 34.47
Recency 12 June 2019 19 February 2020
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

Ryzen 5 3400G has 207.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7532, on the other hand, has a 469.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7532 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3400G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3400G is a desktop processor while EPYC 7532 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3400G and EPYC 7532, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Ryzen 5 3400G
AMD EPYC 7532
EPYC 7532

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 2114 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3400G or EPYC 7532, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.