i3-10350K vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 3400G and Core i3-10350K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1112 | not rated |
Place by popularity | 91 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
Power efficiency | 8.48 | no data |
Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | Comet Lake (2020) |
Release date | 12 June 2019 (5 years ago) | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3400G and Core i3-10350K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Multiplier | 37 | no data |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
Number of transistors | 4940 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3400G and Core i3-10350K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | AM4 | 1200 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 91 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and Core i3-10350K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 3400G and Core i3-10350K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and Core i3-10350K are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and Core i3-10350K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and Core i3-10350K.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 5.47 | 3.09 |
Recency | 12 June 2019 | 30 April 2020 |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 91 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3400G has 77% faster integrated GPU, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.
i3-10350K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 3400G and Core i3-10350K. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3400G and Core i3-10350K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.