i7-3612QM vs Ryzen 5 3350G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3350G
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.87
+93.1%

Ryzen 5 3350G outperforms Core i7-3612QM by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i7-3612QM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11291642
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesPicassoIntel Core i7
Power efficiencyno data7.92
Architecture codenameno dataIvy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)29 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i7-3612QM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data256K (per core)
L3 cache4096 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data160 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i7-3612QM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketAM4FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i7-3612QM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i7-3612QM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i7-3612QM are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i7-3612QM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10Intel HD Graphics 4000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i7-3612QM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i7-3612QM.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3350G 5.87
+93.1%
i7-3612QM 3.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3350G 8989
+92.9%
i7-3612QM 4659

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.87 3.04
Integrated graphics card 4.24 1.18
Chip lithography 12 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 3350G has a 93.1% higher aggregate performance score, 259.3% faster integrated GPU, and a 83.3% more advanced lithography process.

i7-3612QM, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 3350G is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-3612QM in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3350G is a desktop processor while Core i7-3612QM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i7-3612QM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3350G
Ryzen 5 3350G
Intel Core i7-3612QM
Core i7-3612QM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 240 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3350G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 310 votes

Rate Core i7-3612QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3350G or Core i7-3612QM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.