i3-1000NG4 vs Ryzen 5 3350G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 3350G outperforms Core i3-1000NG4 by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i3-1000NG4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1133 | 1820 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Picasso | Intel Ice Lake |
Power efficiency | no data | 23.53 |
Architecture codename | no data | Ice Lake-Y (2020) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 18 March 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i3-1000NG4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 8 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 4 GT/s |
L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4096 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | no data | 123 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i3-1000NG4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | AM4 | Intel BGA 1044 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i3-1000NG4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | + |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i3-1000NG4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i3-1000NG4 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i3-1000NG4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | LPDDR4-3733 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 58.3 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 900 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i3-1000NG4 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i3-1000NG4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | no data | Yes, at 120Hz |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 5120 x 3200@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 5120 x 3200@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i3-1000NG4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i3-1000NG4.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 5.77 | 2.28 |
Integrated graphics card | 4.24 | 4.70 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 9 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3350G has a 153.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
i3-1000NG4, on the other hand, has 10.8% faster integrated GPU, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 622.2% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 3350G is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-1000NG4 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 3350G is a desktop processor while Core i3-1000NG4 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3350G and Core i3-1000NG4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.