i3-L13G4 vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Core i3-L13G4 by a whopping 400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 2600X and Core i3-L13G4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 874 | 2036 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 9.51 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Intel Ice Lake |
| Power efficiency | 8.72 | 23.66 |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Lakefield (2020) |
| Release date | 13 April 2018 (6 years ago) | June 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $281 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 2600X and Core i3-L13G4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 5 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 0.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 576 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 82 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4800 Million | 4,050 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2600X and Core i3-L13G4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FC-CSP1016 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600X and Core i3-L13G4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 2600X and Core i3-L13G4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600X and Core i3-L13G4 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600X and Core i3-L13G4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 34 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | - | 500 MHz |
| Execution Units | - | 48 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 2600X and Core i3-L13G4 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | - | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 5 2600X and Core i3-L13G4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen 5 2600X and Core i3-L13G4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | - | DX12 |
| OpenGL | - | OpenGL4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600X and Core i3-L13G4.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 6 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.75 | 1.75 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 5 |
| Threads | 12 | 5 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 7 Watt |
Ryzen 5 2600X has a 400% higher aggregate performance score, and 20% more physical cores and 140% more threads.
i3-L13G4, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 1257.1% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 2600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-L13G4 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 2600X is a desktop processor while Core i3-L13G4 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600X and Core i3-L13G4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
