Xeon E7-4880 v2 vs Ryzen 5 2600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.46
Xeon E7-4880 v2
2014
15 cores / 30 threads, 130 Watt
31.07
+267%

Xeon E7-4880 v2 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by a whopping 267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E7-4880 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking903135
Place by popularity22not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.85no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency12.0922.20
Architecture codenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)no data
Release date13 April 2018 (6 years ago)1 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E7-4880 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)15 (Pentadeca-Core)
Threads1230
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache576 KBno data
L2 cache3 MBno data
L3 cache16 MB (shared)37.5 MB
Chip lithography12 nm22 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °C73 °C
Number of transistors4800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E7-4880 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4
SocketAM4FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E7-4880 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAEno data46 Bit
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E7-4880 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E7-4880 v2 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E7-4880 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size128 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s85 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E7-4880 v2.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2032

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2600 8.46
Xeon E7-4880 v2 31.07
+267%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2600 13189
Xeon E7-4880 v2 48435
+267%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.46 31.07
Recency 13 April 2018 1 January 2014
Physical cores 6 15
Threads 12 30
Chip lithography 12 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 130 Watt

Ryzen 5 2600 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 83.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

Xeon E7-4880 v2, on the other hand, has a 267.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

The Xeon E7-4880 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2600 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop processor while Xeon E7-4880 v2 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E7-4880 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Xeon E7-4880 v2
Xeon E7-4880 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 14903 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 19 votes

Rate Xeon E7-4880 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600 or Xeon E7-4880 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.