EPYC 9475F vs Ryzen 5 2600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking903not rated
Place by popularity22not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.84no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency12.09no data
Architecture codenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)Turin (2024)
Release date13 April 2018 (6 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$7,592

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads1296
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache576 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm4 nm
Die size213 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4800 Million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2018 10 October 2024
Physical cores 6 48
Threads 12 96
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 400 Watt

Ryzen 5 2600 has 515.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9475F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 14904 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600 or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.