i9-13700HX vs Ryzen 5 2600
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i9-13700HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 900 | not rated |
Place by popularity | 22 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 10.48 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Raptor Lake-HX |
Power efficiency | 12.09 | no data |
Architecture codename | Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) | Raptor Lake |
Release date | 13 April 2018 (6 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i9-13700HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 12 | 24 |
Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 34 | no data |
L1 cache | 576 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 3 MB | no data |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 4800 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i9-13700HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | AM4 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i9-13700HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i9-13700HX are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i9-13700HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i9-13700HX.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 6 | 16 |
Threads | 12 | 24 |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Ryzen 5 2600 has 92.3% lower power consumption.
i9-13700HX, on the other hand, has 166.7% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i9-13700HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop processor while Core i9-13700HX is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i9-13700HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.