Celeron U3600 vs Ryzen 5 2600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2600 and Celeron U3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking905not rated
Place by popularity22not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.80no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency12.08no data
Architecture codenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)11 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600 and Celeron U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier349
L1 cache96K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache3 MB512 KB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography12 nm32 nm
Die size192 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and Celeron U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Celeron U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI+-
FMA++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 2600 and Celeron U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Celeron U3600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Celeron U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-800
Maximum memory size128 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s12.799 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video-+
Graphics max frequency-500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 2600 and Celeron U3600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Celeron U3600.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2600 13189
+2178%
Celeron U3600 579

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2018 11 January 2011
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 12 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

Ryzen 5 2600 has an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron U3600, on the other hand, has 261.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 2600 and Celeron U3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop processor while Celeron U3600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600 and Celeron U3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Celeron U3600
Celeron U3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 14962 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Celeron U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600 or Celeron U3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.