FX-6350 vs Ryzen 5 2500U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2500U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.11
+42.2%
FX-6350
2013
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.89

Ryzen 5 2500U outperforms FX-6350 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2500U and FX-6350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14021669
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency25.912.19
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date26 October 2017 (7 years ago)29 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2500U and FX-6350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads86
Base clock speed2 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)6144 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2500U and FX-6350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and FX-6350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and FX-6350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and FX-6350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 8On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and FX-6350.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2500U 4.11
+42.2%
FX-6350 2.89

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2500U 6536
+42.1%
FX-6350 4598

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 2500U 811
+67.9%
FX-6350 483

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 2500U 2376
+55.4%
FX-6350 1529

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.11 2.89
Recency 26 October 2017 29 April 2013
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 6
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen 5 2500U has a 42.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 33.3% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

FX-6350, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores.

The Ryzen 5 2500U is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 2500U is a notebook processor while FX-6350 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2500U and FX-6350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Ryzen 5 2500U
AMD FX-6350
FX-6350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1141 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 377 votes

Rate FX-6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2500U or FX-6350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.