EPYC 7F32 vs Ryzen 5 2500U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2500U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.28

EPYC 7F32 outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by a whopping 258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 7F32 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1380473
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.81
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency26.027.76
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date26 October 2017 (7 years ago)14 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 7F32 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier2037
L1 cache384 KB512 KB
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size209.78 mm274 mm2
Number of transistors4950 Million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 7F32 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5SP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 7F32. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 7F32 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 7F32. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 7F32.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2500U 4.28
EPYC 7F32 15.32
+258%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2500U 6546
EPYC 7F32 23453
+258%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.28 15.32
Recency 26 October 2017 14 April 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 180 Watt

Ryzen 5 2500U has 1100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7F32, on the other hand, has a 257.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7F32 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2500U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 2500U is a notebook processor while EPYC 7F32 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 7F32, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Ryzen 5 2500U
AMD EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1121 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2500U or EPYC 7F32, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.