Xeon w7-3445 vs Ryzen 5 2400GE

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2400GE
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
4.80
Xeon w7-3445
2023
20 cores / 40 threads, 270 Watt
30.71
+540%

Xeon w7-3445 outperforms Ryzen 5 2400GE by a whopping 540% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon w7-3445 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1263139
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.60
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency12.7410.56
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,989

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon w7-3445 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads840
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache384 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)52.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size209.78 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon w7-3445 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon w7-3445. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon w7-3445 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon w7-3445 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon w7-3445. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon w7-3445.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2400GE 4.80
Xeon w7-3445 30.71
+540%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2400GE 7477
Xeon w7-3445 47864
+540%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.80 30.71
Recency 19 April 2018 15 February 2023
Physical cores 4 20
Threads 8 40
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 270 Watt

Ryzen 5 2400GE has 671.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3445, on the other hand, has a 539.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

The Xeon w7-3445 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2400GE in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 2400GE is a desktop processor while Xeon w7-3445 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon w7-3445, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
Ryzen 5 2400GE
Intel Xeon w7-3445
Xeon w7-3445

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 85 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2400GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 5 votes

Rate Xeon w7-3445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2400GE or Xeon w7-3445, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.