Celeron G3902E vs Ryzen 5 2400GE
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 2400GE and Celeron G3902E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1263 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 12.74 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 19 April 2018 (6 years ago) | 2 January 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 2400GE and Celeron G3902E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 32 | 16 |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 98.57 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4950 Million | 1750 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2400GE and Celeron G3902E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2400GE and Celeron G3902E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2400GE and Celeron G3902E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2400GE and Celeron G3902E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | LPDDR3-1866 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 34.134 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | Intel HD Graphics 510 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2400GE and Celeron G3902E.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 5.47 | 1.61 |
| Recency | 19 April 2018 | 2 January 2016 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Ryzen 5 2400GE has 239.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Celeron G3902E, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 2400GE and Celeron G3902E. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 2400GE is a desktop processor while Celeron G3902E is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2400GE and Celeron G3902E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
