Xeon E-2478 vs Ryzen 5 2400G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2400G
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.70
Xeon E-2478
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
19.49
+242%

Xeon E-2478 outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by a whopping 242% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2400G and Xeon E-2478 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1144310
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.0982.50
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency8.0022.22
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date8 January 2018 (6 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169$568

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2478 has 1255% better value for money than Ryzen 5 2400G.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2400G and Xeon E-2478 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache386 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size209.78 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2400G and Xeon E-2478 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Xeon E-2478. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 2400G and Xeon E-2478 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Xeon E-2478 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Xeon E-2478. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Xeon E-2478.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2400G 5.70
Xeon E-2478 19.49
+242%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2400G 8726
Xeon E-2478 29827
+242%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.70 19.49
Recency 8 January 2018 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 80 Watt

Ryzen 5 2400G has 23.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2478, on the other hand, has a 241.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Xeon E-2478 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2400G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 2400G is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2478 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2400G and Xeon E-2478, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Ryzen 5 2400G
Intel Xeon E-2478
Xeon E-2478

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1426 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2478 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2400G or Xeon E-2478, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.